Blackjack or Roulette?
Updated
Blackjack, by a distance — 0.46% against 5.26% on a double-zero wheel. Your money lasts roughly eleven times longer. The one thing that reverses this is playing blackjack badly, which is common enough to be worth its own warning.
- Blackjack with the chart: 0.46%. Double-zero roulette: 5.26%.
- Roulette needs no skill and rewards none. Its edge is identical for everyone.
- Blackjack rewards study and punishes guesswork — up to 3.49%.
- Only blackjack can be beaten at all, and only under conditions most tables no longer offer.
The edge, and what it buys
Stake $100 across an evening. Blackjack with correct play takes about $0.46; double-zero roulette takes $5.26. Same money, same evening, eleven times the cost.
Roulette’s number comes from a single fact: the wheel has 38 pockets and pays as though it had 36. Every bet on the layout carries that same 5.26%, which is why no roulette system has ever worked or can.
One game has decisions and one does not
This is the real difference and it cuts both ways. Roulette asks nothing of you, so you cannot play it badly. Blackjack asks a great deal, and a player who refuses to risk busting is paying 3.49% — about two thirds of a roulette wheel, at a table they chose because it had better odds.
If you are not going to learn the chart, the honest advice is that the difference between the two games is much smaller than the reputation suggests.
Only one of them can be beaten
No amount of study changes a roulette wheel. Blackjack can, in principle, be turned positive by counting cards — but that needs a deep shoe, a real bet spread, a bankroll and hours, and most tables you can reach no longer provide the first two.
The realistic version: blackjack is the cheapest entertainment on the casino floor for someone willing to learn a chart. Not an income.
Keep reading
By Martin Kosek · every number on this site is computed by us, not copied.
← Back to guides