The Smaller Live Studios
Updated
Away from the four large studios the rules stop converging entirely. One of these tables has the best blackjack rule set we have found anywhere online, one has the worst, and for two of them nobody publishes a house edge at all. We computed the ones that can be computed.
- Gold Tier Games offers early surrender against everything but an ace — we compute 0.240%.
- Bombay Live never checks for blackjack, against any card. Our figure 0.595%.
- Visionary iGaming runs six decks but H17, which is the dearest rule set here at 0.669%.
- Vivo Gaming publishes nothing we can compute from. We are not going to estimate it.
Gold Tier Games: the rule nobody has priced
Gold Tier runs tables offering early surrender against every upcard except an ace. Early surrender means you may give up half your bet before the dealer checks for blackjack, so you can even escape a hand the dealer is about to win with one. It is a genuinely valuable rule and it is almost extinct.
The published live-dealer databases do not carry a house edge for these tables, because their models do not handle early surrender. So we computed it. Against an eight-deck S17 game with doubling after a split, early surrender excluding the ace is worth 0.245%, which puts the table at 0.240%.
The reason early surrender is so rare is visible in the same calculation. Extend it to include the ace and the same game comes out at −0.143% — a player advantage, before counting. That is why nobody offers it, and why the version that excludes the ace is where operators stop.
Bombay Live: no peek at all
Bombay Live’s dealer never checks for blackjack, against a ten or an ace. Our figure for eight decks, S17 and doubling after a split on that basis is 0.595%.
Not checking at all costs 0.111%, which is close to the 0.103% that Evolution gives up by not checking on tens alone. The reason the difference is so small is that a dealer ace is a much rarer upcard than a dealer ten, so most of the damage was already being done.
This table needs a different strategy and the standard chart will cost you money on it. Against both a dealer ten and a dealer ace: do not double, and do not split. Not eleven against a ten, not aces against an ace, none of it. The chart assumes a dealer who has already checked; here nobody has. Against every other upcard the normal chart is correct.
This is the same adjustment as a European no-hole-card game, and it is the single most common way to lose money at a table whose rules you have not read.
Visionary iGaming: six decks, and it does not help
Visionary runs six decks rather than eight, which sounds like an improvement and is worth about 0.03%. Then it has the dealer hit soft 17, which costs 0.215% — seven times as much.
Our figure is 0.669%, the most expensive live rule set we have priced. It is a clean demonstration of why deck count is the rule players ask about most and the one that matters least. If you are choosing a table on one number, choose the soft-17 rule, not the deck count.
Our figure assumes Visionary allows doubling after a split, which is what their published edge implies. Without it the table would be at 0.791%.
Vivo Gaming, and what we will not do
Vivo Gaming runs live blackjack. We do not know its deck count, its soft-17 rule, or whether it peeks, and neither does any source we trust.
So there is no number here. We could produce one by assuming the industry standard and computing that, and it would look exactly like the other figures on this page, and it would mean nothing. A house edge is a statement about a specific rule set; without the rule set it is decoration.
The same applies to the Gold Tier figure above, which is why it is labeled. If you are at a Vivo table, the rules panel is the only source that counts.
Counting and fairness at the smaller studios
The smaller studios are not less honest than the large ones, and in Gold Tier’s case the rules are markedly better. What they are is less documented, which shifts the work onto you.
Live blackjack is the most checkable game in an online casino, and that is worth saying plainly. The cards are physical, the shoe is on camera, and you can watch the deal. Nothing about the shuffle or the burn is hidden behind a random number generator the way it is in RNG blackjack.
What a stream cannot show you is the part that matters: where the cut card goes, whether the shoe is the same one after a break, and how the shuffle was done off camera. None of that requires dishonesty to hurt you. A perfectly honest table with a cut card at half the shoe is still a table where counting does not pay.
So the fairness question and the profitability question are separate, and only the second has a clear answer. A license tells you the game is not rigged. It does not tell you the game is beatable.
Keep reading
By Martin Kosek · every number on this site is computed by us, not copied.
← Back to guides